/bmi/media/media_files/2025/02/04/8h1ivyj2qgLCrBmv6ZAs.jpg)
New Delhi; Social media is supposedly the go-to for 35% of Delhi voters, with 26% turning to independent blogs. But in a landscape where 53% believe the media is biased, one has to question the quality of 'information' they're digesting. It's a digital echo chamber, where facts might just be as fleeting as the latest viral meme.
The 23 Watts Insights Studio's latest report, "GenZer’sTryst with Polls," paints a rosy picture of informed young Delhiites ready to cast their votes. But delve deeper, and you see a generation possibly more swayed by digital noise than by democratic duty. With 88% awareness of local candidates, are we looking at informed choices or just the echo of social media campaigns?
The study boasts that 71% have voted before, but when you consider that 16% don't even have a voting ID, and 7.7% choose not to vote despite having one, the reality might be less about civic engagement and more about social media's fleeting influence.
Party manifestos, supposedly guiding 66% of the youth, might not hold the weight they're given when 74% acknowledge that freebies sway their votes. Is this the new democracy - one where policy takes a backseat to what's immediately gratifying?
Candidate credibility is another buzzword thrown around, with 62% supposedly caring about it. Yet, in a city where 44% view law and order as poor, one must wonder what 'credibility' truly means when candidates are more known for their social media presence than their governance.
The report suggests a generation plugged into digital platforms, but with 37% believing that election marketing is all about money spent, it paints an image of young voters more captivated by the spectacle of campaigning than the substance of policy.
The priorities are laid out: women's safety at 85%, unemployment at 60%, and pollution at 56%. But if these issues are so critical, why does the report fail to critique how social media might be diluting these concerns into mere hashtags and likes, rather than driving real change?
Tarundeep Singh, Lead, The 23 Watts Insights Studio, said, “Contrary to popular belief, young voters in Delhi are well-informed, engaged, and eager to make a difference in the upcoming elections. As a digitally native generation, they rely on social media and independent blogs for information, which has significantly enhanced their awareness of candidates and party manifestos. Not only are Gen Z voters informed, but they are also deeply committed to the electoral process. They are prioritizing a safer environment for women, greater job opportunities, and cleaner air, making it clear that their vote is driven by issues that shape their future.”
Singh might celebrate a "digitally native generation" eager to "make a difference," but isn't this narrative just another clever marketing ploy? In a world where 53% see media bias, are we sure these young voters are being informed or just informed about what's trending?
In summary, while the report tries to glorify the youth as the new guardians of democracy, the data suggests a generation potentially lost in the maze of social media, where the line between fact and fiction blurs with every scroll. Are Delhi's GenZ voters truly shaping the future, or are they just pawns in a digital chess game, where the next viral post dictates the path to the ballot box?