Ad Spend During Major Racing Events: What Brands Need to Know

author-image
BestMediaInfo Bureau
New Update
pexels-karola-g-5632397

Photo credit: kaboompics.com

Listen to this article
0.75x1x1.5x
00:00/ 00:00

New Delhi: Every year, when a major racing event rolls around the corner, whether it’s the Kentucky Derby, Royal Ascot, or the Melbourne Cup, big brands are preparing their marketing campaigns weeks in advance.

Not because of the horses, but because of the attention.

As you probably already know, big horse racing events aren’t just sporting events. They are also cultural moments; they focus on fashion and luxury and have that prestigious vibe. Big brands love that. In fact, big brands are all in, not because of the viewership or horse racing fans, but more because of their way of attaching to the same things that big horse racing events represent.

In other words, if you see a prestigious race like the Kentucky Derby featuring a Ford ad, subconsciously, you’ll see Ford as a higher-value brand than before. 

But the part that most people don’t talk about is spending money during a major racing event. It’s easy to dump a large sum of money and hope for the best, but the goal here is to have the maximum return.

You’re Not Just Buying Impressions, You’re Buying Timing

On paper, major racing events look simple. You have millions of viewers, massive betting turnover, and packed grandstands. Easy math, right?

Well, not exactly. The value of ad spending during a big racing event isn’t just about how many people are watching. As we mentioned before, it’s more about when they’re watching, who’s watching, and what state of mind they’re in.

Take the Kentucky Derby in the U.S. This is one of the most prestigious races in the country, where highly influential people (with money) turn up, there is red carpet fashion coverage, celebrity arrivals, pre-race analysis, and betting discussions. The actual race? Well, that lasts only two minutes.

If you place your spending only around the race itself, you’re fighting for the most expensive real estate, which probably won’t be very profitable. But the emotional energy often builds up earlier, and smart brands usually focus their ad spend before the event even starts.

Immediately after the finish, people rush to check official placements, payouts, and historical comparisons. Traffic surges towards result pages and betting summaries. If you want to understand how intense that post-race attention can be, just look at how quickly fans search for verified finishing orders on sites like TwinSpires that show recent Kentucky Derby outcomes:

But the advertising window doesn’t close as the race finishes. People are still actively searching, comparing, and sharing.

Context Matters More Than Volume

One thing is clear: horse racing audiences are unique. They are very different from football and basketball, as they often attract high-income demographics, corporate hospitality guests, occasional bettors, and social attendees drawn by fashion.

This affects how ad spend performs. That’s why on big events like the Kentucky Derby; we usually see luxurious brands like Rolex with sponsorship deals.

It all comes down to what you’re advertising and which horse racing audience is your main goal.

Betting Drives Urgency

The one thing that horse racing does better than other sports is creating urgency. When people watch a major race, most of them have money involved, even casual viewers. And that changes behavior.

Ads spend around live odds, pre-race analysis, or “last chance to bet” performs differently than generic brand ads. 

Brands should focus on that urgency. And don’t worry about creating chaos. Horse racing fans are used to it. 

Social Media Is Half the Battlefield

Racing events aren’t confined to television anymore.

On Derby Day or Melbourne Cup Day, social media becomes a parallel stadium. People post outfits, bets, reactions, and photos from the stands.

That means brands need to think beyond traditional broadcast placements.

Real-time engagement matters. Quick-response content matters. A clever social post reacting to a dramatic photo finish can outperform a static ad buy if it’s done well.

But it has to feel natural.

Forced, overly corporate messaging during an organic cultural moment stands out for the wrong reasons.

Sponsorship vs. Media Buying

There’s a big difference between sponsoring an event and simply buying ads during it.

Sponsorship embeds you into the story. Your name becomes attached to the event. It shows up in commentary, signage, and hospitality spaces.

Media buying is transactional. You’re renting attention for a window.

Both can work. But they serve different goals.

If you’re trying to build long-term brand association with prestige and tradition, sponsorship might make sense. If you’re driving short-term sales or sign-ups, targeted ad placements, especially digital, might be smarter.

Too many brands blur those goals and end up overspending without clarity.

Final Thoughts

Big horse racing events create a rare kind of attention, and they attract a unique and diverse audience. That’s why most brands love ads before and during such events.

They are one of the most powerful platforms for brands, but ad spend can work best only if timed intelligently, aligned with audience psychology, and with a clear objective.

Advertisment