Advertisment

Ahead of IPL auctions, DishTV questions Star India's 'monopoly' over cricket telecast

In a letter addressed to the Competition Commission of India, Minister of Information & Broadcasting, BCCI and TRAI, Dish TV has tried to explain how acquisition of IPL rights by Star India will create 'unnecessary monopoly' of cricket content in the Indian market

author-image
BestMediaInfo Bureau
New Update
Ahead of IPL auctions, DishTV questions Star India's 'monopoly' over cricket telecast

Dish TV, the DTH arm of Essel Group, has written to the Competition Commission of India (CCI), Minister of Information & Broadcasting (MIB), Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), pointing out concerns about the creation of monopoly in the cricket broadcast vertical. When the auctions for Indian Premiere League’s (IPL) cricketing telecast rights are just round the corner, Dish TV has questioned the intentions of Star India about the likelihood of exponential increase in the cost for consumers because of the creation of 'sole supplier' monopoly in the market.

The letter has explained how Star India owns almost all the important cricket events, including BCCI media rights covering television, internet and mobile for the period July 2012-March 2018, Global Media Rights for Asia Cup (Asia Cup, Women's Asia Cup, Emerging Asia Cup and U19 Asia Cup) including TV, audio, internet and mobile rights for all territories globally for 2016-2023, the Global broadcast rights for all ICC Events, which includes exclusive live and highlights rights across all platforms for ICC major events – the ICC Cricket World Cup and its qualifiers, the ICC Women's World Cup, the ICC World Twenty20 and its qualifiers, the ICC Champions Trophy and the ICC Under-19 Cricket World Cup for the period 2015-2023.

In addition, Star also has the rights for all the bilateral series of the Cricket Broads of Australia, England and Bangladesh and today except for Indian Premier League (IPL), Star has the rights for all the cricketing events to be shown in India for the next 6-7 years.

The letter also mentions the following pointers:

“As per media reports, Star is also one of the potential bidders for the IPL cricket telecast rights. The Star is aiming to acquire the IPL cricket telecast rights also and thereby attain the status of 'sole holder' of the telecast rights of all the major cricketing events. With this objective in view and in order to further strengthen its monopolistic position in the field of media distribution rights, Star has initiated various measures which would have far reaching ramifications and shall have adverse impact on every stakeholder in the broadcasting industry, starting from the distributors of the TV channels like the DTH operators and ultimately the end consumers. The history of the media industry is witness to the fact that all the actions initiated by Star till date have always been to economically concentrate the power through acquisition of Cricket Broadcast Rights and thereby create a monopoly in the market to gain huge commercial advantage at the expense of the Consumers and the Distribution Industry. Since this is a very critical issue, it requires immediate attention of BCCI.

A perusal of the recent developments in the broadcasting sector would reveal that Star is systematically moving towards elimination of competition and creation of monopoly in the cricket telecast segment. They intend to exploit their monopoly status for maximising their subscription and advertisement revenue at the cost of consumers. The prices of TV channels, including the sports channels in India are regulated by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). In fact, TRAI has been regulating the broadcasting and content distribution sector since 2004. TRAI in its recent regulations has capped the maximum retail prices of TV channels including sports channels at Rs 19 per subscriber per month. In order to serve its long term objective of charging the exorbitant price for its sports channels containing cricketing content, Star has challenged the authority/jurisdiction of TRAI itself to fix the price of TV channels and the matter is pending before the High Court of Judicature at Madras.

Not only this, Tata Sky Limited – a DTH service provider and an associate company of Star – has also challenged the price regulations issued by TRAI before the High Court of Delhi. It is clear and apparent that the entire modus operandi of Star is to somehow get the pricing regulations quashed so that it can charge high subscription prices for its sports channels containing cricket content. Needless to mention that this again is an effort by Star to further strengthen the concentration of economic power onto itself and to remove competition from the industry.

Further, the Star has also challenged the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharti) Act, 2007 which provides for mandatory sharing of sporting events of national importance with the Prasar Bharti to enable them to re-transmit the same on its terrestrial networks and Direct-to-Home networks. It is pertinent to mention in this regard that the enactment of the said statute was only a view to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance which inter alia include the major cricket events involving the Indian team. The effort of Star has been to capture the entire broadcasting rights for all cricket events to the exclusion of others and become the 'sole supplier' without even sharing its signals/feed with the national broadcaster i.e. Doordarshan.

It is matter of record that out of the total 27 sports channels available in India, Star has 12 of the same, amounting to a huge share of 44 per cent in terms of numbers (as detailed in Annexure I). Furthermore, as per the data available in the market, out of the total 270 matches played/ to be played by India during the period from 2012-2019, telecast rights of as many as 191 matches are with Star only, which is around 71 per cent of the total matches. In other words, out of 578 days when India team is playing, Star alone shall telecast the matches on 423 days i.e. 73 per cent of the total number of days (kindly refer Annexure 11). Considering the fact that the figures mentioned above do not include the matches falling under the ICC events and Asia Cup events, in both of which India is a participant country and for both of which the distribution rights are held by Star, the actual figures are much higher than the abovementioned figures.

The above is the position when Star does not have the telecast rights for IPL, which are presently held by Sony Pictures. Once Star acquires the telecast rights for IPL as well, not only will the market share in terms of viewership of Star would skyrocket but also the distribution platforms such as DTH and Multi System Operators will have no choice but to subscribe the Star Sports channels for cricket content because of Star's monopolistic position as a sole holder of cricket telecast rights. As per the data released by BARC, in terms of reach, Star channels had a reach of 71 per cent during the time of Champions Trophy for the period between 01.06.17-18.06.17, whereas Sony Pictures, during the IPL session of 05.04.17-14.05.17 had a reach of 88%. In a situation where Star also has the rights for IPL, its channels' reach would have gone up to approximately 85 per cent during IPL also (kindly refer Annexure Ill). One this happens, this would enable the Star to exorbitantly price their sports channels and would also result in the Star being able to extort very high advertisement rates which is estimated to be in the range of about Rs 2,050 crore which would constitute about 93 per cent of total advertisement revenue earned by all sports channels in India (please refer Annexure IV). It is a matter of record that in the Year 2010, Star had fixed the rate of Rs 9,000 per subscriber per month for its HD Channels. Such a situation may again arise in case Star is able to create a monopoly over the cricket broadcast rights. In addition, this may also result into Star making "subscribing to its sports channels" as a precondition for availing any other channel of Star. This would sound the death kneel for all other sports channels operating in India and is blatantly anti-competitive.

The pictures, as emerges from the above, clearly indicates that with the blessing of BCCI, the growth of Star has been exponential capturing all the rights for all the cricketing events to be shown in India except for lone event of IPL. The nation has witnessed the anarchical situation prevailing in BCCI leading to intervention by the Supreme Court and consequent appointment of Vinod Rai as the Interim President to look after the administration of BCCI until further elections are held. With the management being managed by the Committee of Administrators (COA), we can expect some positive and remarkable changes in the way of functioning of BCCI. In the various judicial pronouncements it has been held that BCCI is a public body discharging public functions. Accordingly it is expected that all the actions of BCCI in discharge of its function would not only lead to the furtherance of 'public interest' but will also ensure that no monopoly is allowed to be created around the Cricket Broadcast Rights.

With BCCI going to auction the telecast rights for IPL in next few days, we would expect BCCl led by the COA to act in a manner so as to safeguard and protect the competition in the industry as well as to prevent the creation of any kind of monopoly to the detriment of public interest. The acquisition of the IPL telecast rights by Star would lead to a situation where there will be an absolute monopoly thereby leading to dominance by Star in the field of cricketing telecast rights where Star will not only compel the distributors of TV channels such as the DTH operators to pay exorbitant price for their channels but also make the ultimate consumers to shell more and more money from their pockets. Such a situation would not only be anti-competitive but also anti-consumers as well.

We look forward towards BCCI to adopt pro-competitive and pro-consumer approach as one of the major criteria while awarding the IPL rights so that the rights of entire broadcasting and distribution sector as well as that of the viewers of cricketing events are safeguarded. Accordingly, we would request you to kindly initiate inquiries and issue necessary direction in the matter.”

Info@BestMediaInfo.com

DishTV Star India's 'monopoly' over cricket telecast
Advertisment